A neural basis of choking under pressure
TL;DR
Imagine your brain is a coach drawing a play on a whiteboard for your muscles. For a normal task, the coach draws a clear, simple diagram, and your muscles know exactly what to do. But when a massive, 'championship-level' prize is on the line, the coach gets so excited about the reward that they start scribbling frantically all over the board. The play becomes a messy, confusing jumble. This study found that something similar happens in the motor cortex—the brain's 'whiteboard.' The overwhelming signal of a 'jackpot' reward creates so much neural noise that the specific plan for a movement gets lost, leading to a clumsy error or 'choking.'
Incentives tend to drive improvements in performance. But when incentives get too high, we can “choke under pressure” and underperform when it matters most. What neural processes might lead to choking under pressure? We studied Rhesus monkeys performing a challenging reaching task in which they underperform when an unusually large “jackpot” reward is at stake. We observed a collapse in neural information about upcoming movements for jackpot rewards: in the motor cortex, neural planning signals became less distinguishable for different reach directions when a jackpot reward was made available. We conclude that neural signals of reward and motor planning interact in the motor cortex in a manner that can explain why we choke under pressure.
- 1Incentives can lead to underperformance when they are too high, a phenomenon known as 'choking under pressure'.
- 2Rhesus monkeys underperformed in a reaching task when a large 'jackpot' reward was at stake.
- 3There was a collapse in neural information about upcoming movements for jackpot rewards in the motor cortex.
- 4Neural planning signals became less distinguishable for different reach directions when a jackpot reward was available.
- 5Neural signals of reward and motor planning interact in the motor cortex, explaining the choking under pressure.
Baby chicks pass the bouba-kiki test challenging a theory of language
Imagine you hear the made-up words "bouba" and "kiki" - which one sounds round and soft, and which sounds sharp and spiky? Most people say "bouba" sounds round and "kiki" sounds sharp. This is called the bouba-kiki effect, and scientists thought it might be special to humans and related to how we developed language. But this study found that baby chickens, just hours after hatching, make the same connections! When they heard "bouba-like" sounds, 80% of the chicks walked toward round, curved shapes rather than spiky ones. This suggests that connecting sounds with shapes isn't learned or uniquely human - it might be a basic way that many animals' brains work, going back hundreds of millions of years in evolution.
Single-minus gluon tree amplitudes are nonzero
Imagine tiny particles called gluons are like spinning tops. Their spin can be in one of two directions, which physicists call 'plus' or 'minus'. For decades, the rulebook seemed to say that you could never have a situation where just one gluon was spinning 'minus' and all the others were spinning 'plus' — that outcome was thought to be zero. This paper found a loophole. Under very specific, purely mathematical conditions that don't exist in our physical reality but are useful for calculations, this interaction can happen. The researchers wrote down the exact recipe for it, fixing a small but important detail in our fundamental rulebook for how the universe works.
Sub-part-per-trillion test of the Standard Model with atomic hydrogen
Scientists made an incredibly precise measurement of light emitted by hydrogen atoms that tested one of physics' most fundamental theories - the Standard Model - to an accuracy of 0.7 parts per trillion. This measurement also resolved a long-standing disagreement about the size of protons by confirming the smaller value found in previous experiments with exotic atoms.
Liver exerkine reverses aging- and Alzheimer’s-related memory loss via vasculature
This discovery could lead to new treatments for age-related memory loss and Alzheimer's disease that don't require physical exercise. Instead of just telling people to exercise more, doctors might eventually be able to give patients the specific liver protein (GPLD1) or drugs that block TNAP to achieve the brain benefits of exercise. This is especially important for elderly or disabled people who cannot exercise regularly but still want to protect their memory and cognitive function.